I personally don’t recommend anyone get the Switch 2. The new price points are frankly ridiculous, and I’d hate to see that shit get justified by sales.

Personally, I’d recommend looking into handheld PCs. I haven’t looked into them much myself due to lack of money, but they’re generally much more worth the cost from what I’ve heard.

All that said, I missed that you were looking for something to play with your 7 year old child. Switch might be better, but any handheld would be… notably destructible, so that’s a factor to keep in mind.

The threads linked there have a warning about Ryubing in the comments, too. Apparently the lead dev has done pretty shady stuff on Discord, but being Reddit, it’s all mixed in with deleted accounts and comments and is pretty hard to follow.

SimpMusic can do all of that… Except it only works for about ten days after each version release, then you have to wait a few months for the next.

Can’t really make a ruling without context. At this point, all we know is that you say you posted a riddle and they say it wasn’t.

If a “Ben Shapiro destroys” video doesn’t break any rules, then what’s the issue with it being monetized?

The issue, my friend, is that such videos often do break the rules on hateful content and on misinformation (though those rules may have also been removed after 2020), but are still able to be monetized regardless.

What I’m doubting here is the claim that this kind of content is somehow disproportionately pushed to people who have no interest in it.

Straw man. You may have had that argument with someone else, but no one on this comment chain ever made that claim but you.

My personal experience doesn’t support the claim that right-wing media is being disproportionately pushed to people who aren’t interested in it.

They didn’t ever make that claim, that’s just your straw man.

The person I was replying too didn’t mention Left or Right and neither did I.

Question: are you really this dense, or just acting in bad faith?

Silencing your ideological opponents is ethically and morally inferior and I don’t care what your supposed motivation is.

“I want to eliminate all of insert racial or religious slur.”

“That’s bad.”

“I want to stop that person from saying and doing that.”

"That’s exactly as bad.*

Ah yes, the classic “lOOk aT tHE TOlEraNt LEfT” argument.

Or is it maybe this one?

Or maybe it’s both. Ya know, because they’re the same argument. This exact argument has taken so many forms in the past decade, and it’s always founded on the same fallacy. It’s a false equivalency.

The moment I click on a “Ben Shapiro destroys” video, sure - I get plenty more in my feed. But they also go away when I stop engaging.

Uh huh. Which means they’re being pushed to people they think will engage, which means they’re being monetized or are at least considered monetizable if the creator isn’t eligible. Like they said.

YDI

You went to a community you disagree with and downvoted almost everything that was there. Sounds like probable trolling to me.

In before this creates a safe space for transphobia and bigotry but does nothing to address shit like that one YouTuber that recently got permanently banned because she knocked over a lamp their automated systems flagged it as “child abuse content.”

That’s not a complete sentence.

This mod is a known problem. Best to block the community and move on to a better one.

If you’re on PC, you can also grab cookies from a browser to use liked playlists, but I don’t know if it’ll work for YTM likes, as I don’t know if that playlist actually exists on normal YouTube.

Same as the name of the sub, “Power Trippin’ Bastard,” in reference to the mod in question of course.

Gmail blocks archives? That’s pretty shitty. Passworded archives, I could understand, but all archives? (Epubs are basically zipped websites)

Alright, I’m done with your lying and moving goalposts. I’m gonna do what I always do with people who act in bad faith and block you.

But first, I’ll say, I cited the Mali civil war because it’s ongoing. They were also one of two parties in the Sino-Vietnamese war after Vietnam invaded Cambodia. This was in 1979, with ongoing smaller conflicts until the 90s.

They also took control of the Paracel Islands during the Vietnam War, 1974.

And while neither of these were started by China, your original stance didn’t include that little asterisk, you just moved the goalposts when you were proven wrong by the proud, public admission of Chinese officials.

While China may not have been involved in many conflicts, or started any of them themselves, neither of these classifiers were a part of your original position, and you only started shifting when people proved you wrong. You’re a petulant child who can’t stand to say “I was wrong.”

You included the Yemeni Civil War. Same situation.
Nice try #1.

You didn’t say “no war that they started,” you said “no wars, that’s a fact,” which I was responding to and proving false.
Nice try #2.

Nice try? WTF are you on about?

China, as a part of the U.N., has been taking part in the Mali war. Here is an article from 2016 in which officials address this fact.

China now has more than 2,400 peacekeepers in Mali and other African countries, she said, adding that the country would continue to positively contribute to U.N. peacekeeping missions to help ensure peace and stability in Africa.