Oh? And is this “Rayleigh” here in the room with us right now??
No.
Oh? And is this “Rayleigh” here in the room with us right now??
Oh shit, I gotta find a copy of BLUR. That game was my.jam on 360.
With a magnetic switch so it flashes on an instant before snapping shut and shuts off when opened!
Got it. Print to a low quality JPG, the use AI upscaling to restore the text and graphs.
Okay.
(Work in progress)
https://discord.com/invite/gUczTkphGE
Ooh! Extra cheesesticks music!
deleted by creator
find and report scientific errors
Hell, the fact that any articles have been published with the openAI “I can’t provide up-to-date info” means that shit’s not getting read properly, overall.
“How can I know they’re an experienced mushroomed?” “Well, for one… they’re not dead.”
You had colleagues with the time to proofread yours?! Lucky…
“Okay, so what you’re saying is… [completely off-base attempt at saying what I just said, but so out of touch with reality that I question whether I’ve completely fucked up the entire lecture somehow], right?”
The one thing I can think of that approaches support for the idea is “Joe, the split-brain patient”'s case. You can show him stuff on the right side of his visual field, and he’ll tell you what it is. Show him something on the left side of his vision, and he can draw it and react to it, but can’t name it. The speech center of his brain is disconnected from the right hemisphere due to that procedure.
I was hired to teach at a non-research college… except admin are trying to finnegal us into doing off-contract studies and publishing, moving forward. So yes, in the worst cases, it’s done even off-wage.
It’s perfectly cromulent. C’mon. (Me, 2024)
deleted by creator
Dammit Jim, I’m a psychologist, not a physicist!
I’d read a piece that even just having a camera present has the same effect.
Good one!
Okay, class. We’re going to watch NOVA today.
“Earth: God’s Baby Rattle”