Someone interested in many things.

  • 6 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle






  • If the piece was merely sharing an opinion, it does seem like over-moderation to remove something like that. I often take the approach of surface-level content moderation, as I don’t have the time or desire to vet every single link and keep track of which sites have the “right” viewpoints on certain things. Vote-based sites like Lemmy or Reddit often are sufficient to weed out bad links; a mod’s job should be to remove content that is obviously against the plain meaning interpretation of the community rules. If someone posts a Nazi flag here with the title “Hitler Rules,” it would obviously be against any rules about “hateful content.” However, this is the equivalent of someone saying, “This article about which bottled water brands are the best is bad because the person who wrote it said something mean to me a few years ago.”




  • Yeah, I heavily modified and expanded upon someone else’s query to seek out and destroy more of the accounts. Theirs is basically pattern-matching some of the Gmail-with-numbers spam, but there’s a subset using junk@junk with no actual .TLD to try and get people’s email verification to bounce. Someone else said that ended up in people getting their email relay account suspended, hence why email verification (at least without CAPTCHAs) is a fairly bad idea. I added a table join and some extra matching to find some of those extra bogus “emails,” which typically results in quite a few more accounts being banned. There are two major caveats with my method: 1) it doesn’t delete the accounts, which is really just a simple modification to the query to “fix,” and 2) it doesn’t deal with spam accounts that have no email attached, although those seem to be a fairly small subset of the account spam. I’ll see if there is an easier way to deal with those, but getting most banned or deleted is still pretty easy.