British crosswords are MORE cryptic than American ones? I can’t consistently solve the LA Times or NYT crossword after Wednesday; I probably wouldn’t be able to do any British puzzles.
I get access to the NYT puzzles app through my library card, which has a very long backlog and lots of packs, so that may be an avenue worth pursuing.
Not really, unfortunately. Firefox has only like 85% of the spec implemented, iirc. It is the browser I develop in most, personally, though, fwiw.
64.7% of all web traffic was from Google Chrome in 12/23. Companies like it because you can develop for one browser and support most people.
I feel like Apple could have foreseen this when they marketed a dev kit as a consumer product.
I don’t really understand the first question because you have elided some important details, but for the second question, there’s a “files” key you can set in package.json that specifies which files to include in the package tarball. If you set that to some pattern that excludes your tests, they will not be included. Alternatively, you can create a .npmignore file.
This seems like the starter pack you’re looking for: https://dnd.wizards.com/products/dd-core-rules-gift-set – there is no Rules book, as such, just the phb and dms guide.
My country’s national anthem is just one long stupid rhetorical question that’s impossible to sing. It’s super embarrassing at international sporting events when it’s consistently the worst one there.
This is how I generally write documentation for my projects: https://tybalt.org
I feel like maybe you don’t know what a headless component library is. A cli has a head – the terminal. Headless applications, by definition, have no visual portion. For instance, a headless browser is a browser where the web page renders in-memory, but never displays any content. A headless component library, then, is one where the implementor doesn’t provide anything visual, only behavior. For web dev, is very helpful – the library implementator writes all the js, but the css and html (the “head”) are left to the user for use. The best headless component libraries, then have nothing to screenshot without the user supplying some implementation.
What would the world even be like without people feeling the need to be a dick about an obvious joke 😘
Me, developing a headless component library:
I’m thinking about picking up Pikmin 4 – is it any good?
I would absolutely not use the word “superficial” to describe Barbie, and feel fairly confident you haven’t seen the movie given that you’ve chosen it.
I posted https://www.tybalt.org even though its pre-alpha software and got a bit of traffic, some helpful feedback, and a few PRs! I had a great time and would highly recommend it.
I use eleventy + netlify. It’s how I serve my docs site for free: https://www.tybalt.org/pages/eleventy-plugin/
I have a GitHub action that builds and deploys the site on every commit. No database, no running server, just html/css/js. If you’re curious about the setup or have any questions trying to do the same, lemme know!
I use yarn 4 plus turborepo and am very happy with my setup. You can see tybalt for a reasonably-sized project with my preferred monorepo setup.