minus-squareCarlcarla@lemmy.worldtopolitics @lemmy.world•Does “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.linkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoWouldn’t (3) E = (!A) and B and C also be a valid Interpretation? linkfedilink
minus-squareCarlcarla@lemmy.worldtoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Yeah but how much for 4?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months agoHow to pay 8 £^2 linkfedilink
Wouldn’t
(3) E = (!A) and B and C
also be a valid Interpretation?