The thumbnail of people cheering and being ecstatic about the decision looks quite deranged when you acknowledge it’s essentially about permission to murder without care.

I don’t see how that’s an adequate example.

It seems like you’re making a bad attempt at a caricature instead of actually explaining.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I don’t see what makes these things incapable of being present at the same time as democracy.

Seems like these statements are based on feelings, not actual reasoning.

I remember when they had the same idea around 2014, to ban smoking for anyone born in the UK from 2000 onwards. That would have been easier to enforce.