And answers like this are exactly why non techies don’t join and we get posts like this. You’re the problem

You need to get out of .ml more

But eventually the average Soviet citizen was getting more calories than the average US citizen, and the bottom of Soviet society was significantly better off than the better of capitalist society.

As somebody unfamiliar with this topic: Can you back that up please?

All I see is an artist who can’t math

You might as well compare it to eating at fine dining restaurants, in that case. Why compare smart choices in one category to dumb choices in another?

They mention in the article that it probably isn’t as affected as we would guess due to the muddiness of the water

🤮

Forget reddit and forget spez

Butt thermometers

Honestly, it’s something people do actually do sometimes, now that I think about it. Forgiveness almost operates in that fashion.

That’s a pretty cool analogy

Yes, I also already edited my comment with a link going into the incidents and why they’re absolute nonsense.

The model ‘blackmailed’ the person because they provided it with a prompt asking it to pretend to blackmail them. Gee, I wonder what they expected.

Have not heard the one about cancelling active alerts, but I doubt it’s any less bullshit. Got a source about it?

Edit: Here’s a deep dive into why those claims are BS: https://www.aipanic.news/p/ai-blackmail-fact-checking-a-misleading

FYI, there’s many bot accounts already reposting stuff. There was an entire instance previously dedicated to it, though I think it shut down at some point. It was not popular, most people blocked the accounts / instances and they just clogged up the feed for newcomers due to the lack of engagement.

20+ years ago, and I definitely would not have consented to shit then that I love now.

Yes, but past you did consent to shit back then (loans, etc) that affect you today, whether or not you love it. So what’s the difference if the timeline is reversed?

From a legal perspective, the you of today is the same individual as the you of ten years in the future. And the you of today is perfectly capable of making binding decisions affecting future you, so my question is, why not vice versa.

Or if you want to make it easier - if you could send a message back to yesterday, should you be allowed to do something legally binding on behalf of yesterday’s you?

If I ever change my mind then so too does the status of the consent.

Not really. I’m not talking about just sex here. There’s plenty of legally binding stuff you can’t withdraw from one you’ve agreed to them.

They’re two physically separate bits of mass

What if tomorrow you was sending messages back in time to make arrangements on your behalf?

with different opinions on the situation

Yes, ask anybody who wakes up the next morning with a killer hangover if they have a different opinion of the situation.

Yes, but this question relies on the premise that they ARE the same individual, at different points in the person’s life.

Put it another way, past you can and does give consent on behalf of future you all the time. Assuming time travel ever became a real thing, there’s an argument to be made that they’re closely equivalent.

That’s a really weird philosophical question… Can future you consent to stuff on present you’s behalf?

Edit: Everybody seems to think I’m talking about sex for some reason. I’m talking in the general sense of ‘legally binding stuff like contracts’.

Archive.ph/articleurl

Jesus, people, learn to not piss off others if you’re trying to effect change for the better.