I just tell them to google first thing to do after installing Fedora and say “follow the guide except ‘fastest mirror’ just ignore.” Hasn’t failed anyone yet, and since I didn’t have anyone to help me it is what I did when I was new, except I’ve learned the fastest mirror part since then, so I pass along that knowledge.

Actually I think I may try and write up a script that’ll do all this for them, and make it even easier. I already have like half of it in my “new install” script but they don’t need all my packages.

I do recommend Fedora. It’s what I started on (besides tails) and after a couple years I’ve moved to FedoraKDE.

Sure, but then you’re not looking for jobs like “Fire Risk Assessor” which clearly indicates you’ll have to travel to sites and Assess their Risk of Fire on site, so you could safely scroll past something like that and look for something like “Remote Computer Doer” that at least indicates it’s probably remote computer type stuff.

Sounds like the head office is in SE London but you’ll be inspecting areas on the NW side for fire safety adherence, right?

If so, it isn’t like the businesses can bring their whole business down to the office for inspection. I bet “Steve” has the area close to the office but “Jane” just quit and they need someone to cover her old area.

Soft shell tacos are my favorite. Hard shell is ok but there’s nothing like a double wrapped soft taco.

Oh and I just use bash.

Didn’t read that way, and the whole “being a fucking asshole” shtick hasn’t been helping your case. If it was truly a misunderstanding it’s one you could have avoided by being more clear then “how are you liking reddit” or whatever useless question you asked me to “show support” or some such nonsense, and secondly when you identified a possible misunderstanding you could have avoided further conflict by not doubling down and being an asshole again but “for real” this time, simply because I replied in kind to what I clearly thought was you being an asshole in the first place.

You’re not the mega genius you think you are, you caused this issue with your inarticulacy at best. There’s frankly no need for us to speak further, and I will decline to do so after this last comment. Good day.

That’s what palemoon is for. It wouldn’t be my first choice, but if you don’t have the RAM to run crysis librewolf on high it’ll work.

But…it says “august 2017-present” on the screenshot I’m looking at? Right? Also, isn’t July 2024 like, next month?

NO! NO SECURITY! Leave all doors unlocked and make sure nobody has so much as a pointy stick, we just need to ban a specific gun responsible for less than 500 deaths per year accounting for 0.833% repeating of our total gun deaths, that’ll solve everything!

Lol you imply I’m “a redditor,” then when I say “I’ve been here and off reddit longer than you,” which you made applicable by starting said dick measuring contest, you come up with this shit? Try harder I guess, lol.

Good thing I had the info, rather than your baseless assumptions that are factually inaccurate. I too am glad I was able to share it, thanks for creating the opportunity for me to say it by being reactionary to my comment that didn’t even say what you thought it said.

I’m not talking about “the good guy with a gun,” I’m talking about “the person who gets anatomically significant hits on target first almost always wins the gun fight.” You can disbelieve this fairly self evident concept all you wish, but it is the case.

But since you mentioned it, defensive gun uses are estimated (at the lowest) by Harvard at 100k/yr, and that is based solely off of verifiable police reports and completely discounting defensive display mind you. Meanwhile all yearly gun deaths including suicide and accidents are at 60k, intentional firearm homicide is at about 12k, and murders done with rifles are under 500/year.

Now, if 100k is “extremely rare,” what then would 60k, 12k, or 500 be? If it’s that rare why do dumb stuff like try to ban a rifle responsible for 0.83333333333333% of the deaths? Statistically, more than 2 people defended themselves with a firearm yesterday, by a lot, which rarely makes national news either.

The NRA didn’t invent physics, you give them too much credit.

Damn fine reason. Unfortunately not everyone is as lucky as you in not needing one before then, too. I wish they were, but unfirtunately there are still people who want to victimize others. Less than there used to be though, crime has gone down since '93, so that’s a positive!

Fortunately that isn’t the case, those were just the few I mentioned. A bigger gun is not body armor.

If you can decide what I mean despite my corrections and protestations, I too can decide what you mean. I’m over here saying the cops failed to do their jobs and have systemic issues and you’re fighting with me using misinformation. Sure as shit sounds like you’re a back the blue MAGA idiot to me.

THE COPS SHOULD HAVE GONE IN AND DONE THEIR JOBS

Can ya read it now?

Alternatively, hire security, I guess. Because yes, clearly the cops aren’t doing their jobs in cases like this.

Also MAY-FUCKIN’-BE that I’m suggesting we fix the systemic issues, namely that cops don’t have to protect us. Seems that’s controversial enough that you have to attack me with mischaracterizations of my argument, surprising to me.

I’m guessing you find these cop’s actions entirely reasonable and justified, since you’re defending them so hard, right? Or is that a mischaracterization of your argument?

THE COPS SHOULD HAVE GONE IN AND DONE THEIR JOBS

Can ya read it now?

Alternatively, hire security, I guess.

Ayy, thanks lol.

It would seem that many of them are under the impression we can regulate away “most of” the crime and therefore we won’t need to defend ourselves, and we can do this by passing laws like feature bans which only affect people who are afraid of going to prison (which is to say, not mass shooters.) They’d probably tell you they don’t mind self defense, but their actions betray their words.