AgentOrangesicle

Had I more upvotes to give…

Yarp. One (many, likely) that’ll take time to move up the courts in order to stop. Judicial and legislative branches don’t have time to keep up.

So the summation is: we should anticipate legal fuckery (like jerrymandering) that undermines democratic voting? That IS accurate. Sorry I misread you there.

Wait, are you making an argument to skip voting in the elections? (Please vote, people.)

I agree with most of your sentiments. Your central point is still a little hazy to me.

Always tickled when I see the Dragon’s Tail.

To be fair, I’ve met some cool-ass lions that were just hypnotized by Nala’s bedroom eyes.

And dragons, but they tend to have a confusing energy that makes you question if they have a quiet, submissive side.

Ass.

I don’t have a phone. I just witness. I am posting this by sheer force of will. Someone hire me as you CEO.

*(Percieved) importance.

Where did, “how rubbery is that pussy” come from? Goddamn, I thought we had more decorum. This is coming from a furry.

Nope. Nice try, though.

Airhorn.wav

Okay yeah, but… nah, I can’t think of a rebuttal. We’re Michelan Star cooked.

Call it something that implies the administration collectively has small penises. They seem to be insecure about that.

Seems that way through enough experience and empirical evidence. I just wonder what could have happened if we enforced anti-trust law earlier on… they were meant to help prevent monopolistic companies from taking over everything. Maybe it was a lost hope, but I would’ve liked to see the system functioning as intended for once.

What’s the problem? Is it unchecked capitalism? I think it might be unchecked capitalism.

You know when there’s a dog in the office they just write off the whole day as a productivity loss.

SideShowBobUUUUGH.wav

Do you think it’s conspiracy theories that turn people gay and they’re just trying to justify it so they can feel comfortable with their sexualities?