• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • Aermis@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlMust win
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Its not a participation award game. It’s the game of games. It’s not about kelce not getting to play. It’s about the chiefs losing because they’re not utilizing their best weapon. It’s a team sport and you’re watching your team lose because you’re not being used.

    Imagine being on a competitive team project and you’re the best speaker presenting to the state but your teacher decides to let the shy kids try to present, clearly bumbling and being incoherent, letting your opponents out argue every point your peers are making when you clearly can out speak them. You’d be pretty upset with your teacher for getting you to states, you being the reason you’re there, and then once you’re there you’re sidelined.














  • I agree. They should make it that no one person can own more than like 3 properties or something like that.

    Apartments should be owned by the renters. They pay for their management and if it’s poorly managed they can choose to hire someone else.

    Same with condos and the absolute nightmare costs of HOA. No HOA should own a community. The community should own the HOA.


  • Aermis@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Selling your home is not a solution. “Being the owner they would of had more respect for it” is a ridiculous notion to abide by. People will wreck their home as owners just as much as renting. You can easily just argue to have the tenant pay full cost for rent, pay full down payment and then maybe he would have respected how much he was paying for his living solution.

    Do you not understand the costs of buying and selling a home? Having to deal with banks and lending? You think this is the solution every time someone or a family needs to make a living change?

    The guy tried to rent out his property at a reasonable price because he didn’t want to go through the other route. Even without the absurd costs of closing and dealing with mortgage lenders and every party involved, the volatility of the housing market is enough to make people insecure.

    I can tell the majority of people here aren’t home owners and hate landlords like some evil boogeyman but they’re conflating a single or 2 house owner with a renting conglomerate. Selling your home so there’s more homes on the market as a solution is equivalent to turning the water off while brushing your teeth to fight the dwindling supply of water.


  • Man people hate owning property here. Selling your house because you needed to change living conditions for a while is wild. Besides the absolute volatility of housing markets and prices, just the cost of buying/selling a home is a ton. Renting is an easy way of what you did.

    No way do these people think selling your home was the right idea in your position. And it’s not entitlement to want people to take care of property.