Could be a square in a two dimensional space with different rules.

Reading up on the GitHub page, it has a few concerning WIPs. Might not be worth swapping to a different DE.

CT bread scan.

Panel 3 was pulled off so well, I actually felt a bit warm and fuzzy before panel 4.

Terry Pratchett is pretty much the Tolkien of flat earth literature.

Edit: give me 100 upvotes and that will satisfy me more than 2k on Reddit.

Edit 2: AWESOME!

My most recent example with EndeavorOS was trying out KDE which I thought looked really smart on the desktop. Then it started glitching. Arch tends to be bleeding edge so that makes sense. But it meant I had to make a new choice of distribution or DE.

But Debian based Ubuntu? On Virtualbox? That seems a bit off. Maybe LTS would provide the stability you need.

I guess because development is decentralised, that you end up with developers working on different packages and when they update one it has a ripple effect on other packages.

You make a good case. In my more simple case, I need efficient and smart looking PowerPoints and no foss alternative can beat office 2016. And dozens of programs are windows only. I’ve tinkered with wine/play on Linux before and it just doesn’t work out of the box for the majority of programs.

This is something I show students in physics class because they’re just morbid at high school age and I’m pretty morbid myself.

But no, I do black it out on the slideshow and give the antsy a chance to vacate the classroom.

Thanks for the ENHANCE 👍

I reckon you’re thinking of the neutrino which rarely interacts with matter.

So how about a bottle of dry ice?

Profit 😕

I agree CCTV is a bit invasive…depends on the tenants! If I were a landlord with some tenants of concern, I’d have washing machines facing away from CCTV so no laundry is on camera!

‘Free laundry machines’ could essentially be included in the rent, provided laundry machines are used properly and intentional damage paid for. I would be okay with CCTV being employed to ensure this. An extra $10 for water usage, and everyone uses their own detergent.

But does that make sense for capitalists?

I have a toddler and I hope to dear god there’s no lead about. She will lick anything.

Given the choice between licking mercury and licking lead, 96% of respondents answered with lead.

Apologies for the random percentage and quoting fictional data.

Oh got it, thank you!

From my elementary knowledge of chemistry:

I had to go looking for Mercury and Lead and sure enough they look about right.

Column 1 reacts with water so you bet that’ll hurt. Hydrogen needs a boost to start reacting with oxygen so no naked flame is recommended.

Anything in column 7 are desperate to rip electrons away from molecules so yes, permanent damage to your tongue and mouth.

Uranium is alright if you lick it once. A guy ate uranium cake once on TV.

The ‘Please reconsider’ lot seem to be a good way to die a horrible death by radiation.

Tc I believe is technetium which is radioactive and emits gamma rays, perhaps not soluable so stays in your body and you become gamma-man.

I thought you might be correcting me so I checked up the definition. Both are okay?

‘Composed of’ is a better sounding phrasing though.

Thanks, I believe I was being lazy to not want to deal with averaging the density of various rocks, but your suggestion about the density of soil is a good one.

Chemistry and Physics combined make very interesting ‘resonances’ in molecular behaviour. That’s as educated a guess I may make.