Y’all remember like 2 years ago when they claimed the left was banning Dr Seuss books right?

Remember when “Please Clap” ruined Jeb’s entire campaign?

So you agree your comment is irrelevant?

And yet, we actually have the capacity now to provide for everyone’s needs without working anyone to death.

So why don’t we?

2010: We want bigger batteries, they give us colorful phones

2015 We want bigger batteries, they give us 1mm thinner phones

2020 We want bigger batteries, they give us 5 cameras

2025 We want bigger batteries, they give us AI

Phones are a great example of the utter failure of capitalism to address what people actually need and want.

It’s cheap and not bad

Yup. Looks like I’m done getting coffee there

Like all ideologies idiots stick to the rules while forgetting the actual meaning behind them. Compare how Christians act to what their Christ taught.

I hope so too!

The only thing a diagnosis changes is external proof that you have ADHD. If that will help you then yes it will get better.

Personally I stopped taking ADHD meds. They changed me into a different person and I’d rather learn to live with myself.

Could I replicate charged batteries, then plug them in? Or would it take more energy to make the battery than you could get out of it? After all a battery is just a chemical reaction.

Sisko built a ship that could travel between planets and it didn’t even have an engine…

That’s a good point. It can’t be replicated, right? Who controls the dilithium controls the universe, the dilithium must flow.

My understanding is that replicators restructure atoms. In which case an asteroid would be plenty of material for a ship, even if some of it is lost in the process.

It wouldn’t be the first time we’ve just ignored the supreme court

It wouldn’t even be the first time people were deported over political ideology.

I don’t know if you’ve been paying attention to everything that’s happened since the industrial revolution but that’s not how it’s going to work

If a majority of people vote Republican and they win, that’s a good thing. It seems like you don’t really understand ranked choice voting. It’s not perfect but it’s absolutely better than our current system.

Wait is this loss

Specifically, which problem do you think that ranked choice proponents are incorrect about?

Ranked choice voting does one thing, allows people to vote for the candidates they actually want and that’s it. All kinds of people try to shoehorn in other ideas, but at the end of the day the one and only problem its intensed to solve is people having to vote for candidates they don’t like.