You can combine both widget toolkits in one app‽

It’s been two months sir

deleted by creator

KIT Scenarist seems good to me, despite its creators ditching it for starc.

or filled with commercial and AI tools (Story Architect)

Why not just ignore these tools and use the free ones?

@pcouy Don’t confuse crypto with cryptography; I don’t see anything about cryptocurrencies here

@opensource @andrew

I meant that the Japanese use the Chinese word for Pomelo to call the Yuzu

SourceHut actually had a really nice UI! I’ll consider it. I currently don’t have problems with GitLab save for the UI learning curve (and their EE is source-available) but I’ll consider what you’ve said.

And in Chinese

TIL The Japanese call Yuzu what we (the Chinese) call the Pomelo

Credit: DALL-E 3 / Microsoft Designer

na na-na-na na na, na na, na na na na nana!

Dunno about you, but “Starknet” sounds like that comic arc where Iron Man gets a venomous suit and enshittifies life.

To combine the comments would probably require a revision to the lemmy protocol, plus an even bigger one to the backend software to keep backwards compatibility

…is that seriously your reason? Do you know about how Codeberg displayed something about a javascript error on top of that website for months? Mistakes happen, and as long as they have backup plans I don’t see how that is an issue.

Why does nobody ever recommend GitLab

Why does nobody ever recommend GitLab

Only if you completely disregard the userland and impound the definition of Linux to the kernel base

Users don’t contribute builds. They contribute a specification file for how the build is made, which through the AUR is downloaded and executed. You can see the package source for every AUR package, and most AUR helpers make you look at the specification file by default.

New packages on flathub are moderated, though I haven’t encountered any problems from AUR’s moderation model either other than it sometimes being slow but harmful stuff is removed pretty fast