• 1 Post
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle





  • The links from that post and top comment point out that that initiative was dropped. It got mired down in bikeshedding from hundreds of opinions and SO eventually just said, “Fuck it.”

    The MIT announcement thread was edited with the cancellation announcment:

    Update: January 15, 2016

    Thank you for your patience and feedback. The changes proposed here have been delayed indefinitely - we’ll be back later to open some more discussions.

    The top comment from your link points out the current license:

    TL;DR: Source code on SO is still licensed under CC-BY-SA.

    And CC BY-SA is the only license listed on the official help page.

    • Content contributed before 2011-04-08 (UTC) is distributed under the terms of CC BY-SA 2.5.
    • Content contributed from 2011-04-08 up to but not including 2018-05-02 (UTC) is distributed under the terms of CC BY-SA 3.0.
    • Content contributed on or after 2018-05-02 (UTC) is distributed under the terms of CC BY-SA 4.0.


  • Communism =/= leftism. It’s an extreme form of socialism.

    My biggest problem isn’t even the communist ideals. Have your ideas, that’s fine. I don’t care.

    My problem is the amount of people coming into post comments attacking American Imperialism® on posts that aren’t even related to communist ideals or, sometimes, that don’t even mention America. It gets tiring reading how much America sucks when that’s not even the point of the post.









  • Apple Kills Its Plan to Scan Your Photos for CSAM

    That headline literally says they’re not doing that. It was a well-meaning initiative that they rightfully backed down on when called out.

    I am one of the first to typically assume malice or profit when a company does something, but I really think Apple was trying to do something good for society in a way that is otherwise as privacy-focused as they could be. They just didn’t stop to consider whether or not they should be proactive in legal matters, and when they got reamed by privacy advocates, they decided not to go forward with it.