

Youāre right that a lot has changed for the better, especially when it comes to legal rights for LGBTQ+ people. The AIDS crisis was devastating and compounded by the cruelty of being denied the most basic recognitions like visiting your partner in the hospital or even being allowed to stay in your home after they passed. Legal victories like Lawrence v. Texas, Obergefell, and Bostock were historic, and they represent real, hard-won progress.
But I think itās also important to recognize that legal inclusion doesnāt always mean liberation. A lot of those rights are still tied to institutions like marriage, which leave out anyone who doesnāt fit that mold. Marriage shouldnāt be the gateway to healthcare or housing security. That just reinforces the idea that some relationships or lives are more worthy of protection than others.
Same goes for healthcare. The Affordable Care Act helped, but it still left healthcare tied to jobs and profit. Life-saving medications exist, but theyāre still out of reach for many because of how expensive and inaccessible our system is. PrEP, for example, is amazing in what it can do, but the fact that itās rationed through patents and insurance barriers says a lot about who this system really serves.
And while the internet has opened up huge spaces for connection and organizing, it also turned our identities into data and our attention into profit. Social media connects, but it also surveils and exploits. So even in our victories, the system keeps finding ways to profit off our survival.
I think the pessimism today is more than just a vibe shift. People feel it because they know deep down that weāre still not free. That our progress is fragile, often built on the same systems that oppress others. The question isnāt just whether things are better. Itās whether weāre building something that wonāt keep leaving people behind.
Context, my pal. Theyāre not talking about ALL employees of the government, theyāre talking about bureaucracy and ineffective governing.