• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    looks like western sponsors of the war might have had enough of Zelensky

    It is time for sober reflection. The Ukrainian people deserve leadership focused on practical, achievable objectives, not on grandstanding gestures. While courage and defiance are admirable, they must be tempered with strategic wisdom. The path to victory lies not in symbolic acts of defiance, but in the methodical, relentless pursuit of territorial liberation.

    • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      The path to victory lies not in symbolic acts of defiance, but in the methodical, relentless pursuit of territorial liberation.

      That’s just stupid. Are they really suggesting Ukraine should focus solely on grinding through fortified Russian defenses? War is more complicated than “just liberate the occupied territory”. And while it’s true that this counteroffensive has its risks. Everything they do or don’t do has its risks.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I think they are just meant Ukraine should stick to the original strategy of prolonging the war no matter what. It’s lost either way, but costly losses will finish it faster than daily grind as usual.

        • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not sure how to understand your comment. Currently neither side is winning or loosing. Which is why neither side is willing to give up. The west needs to decide if they want to keep it that way, or give Ukraine enough support so they can finish the job “fast”.

            • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ukraine needs a steady supply of modern weapons and the freedom to use them on Russian territory. That way they can continue dismantling the Russian military and minimize casualties. The Russians are pulling a lot of equipment from storage and are refurbishing it. But those storages won’t last forever. Also, Russia may have a large population (so does Ukraine), but pretty much everybody willing to fight is already fighting. Also economic hardships are only going to increase. In other words, political instability in Russia is increasing and with it Putin’s ability to mobilize troops. Don’t forget, Putin can pull out at any time without loosing his power. For Ukraine it’s about survival.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                3 months ago

                It seems for every issue in Russia you pose, Ukraine is faring worse-off. Ukraine is grabbing people off the streets, the majority of die-hard loyalists signed up when the war started.

                I don’t see how Ukraine wins by “using modern weapons on Russian Territory.”

                • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes, Ukraine faces a lot of the same problems. That’s why it needs international help. The difference is that even if Ukranians don’t want to fight. At least they have a good reason to.

                  I’m not saying that victory will be easy. All I’m saying is that it’s very much possible.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    I just don’t see a possible victory for Ukraine, at all. Maybe in the past, but at this point it seems like Ukraine should be focused on making their terms of surrender as beneficial to themselves as possible. I don’t see Kursk changing that calculus.