• Sentinian@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    So on the topic, can someone explain why birth rates are so important if it isn’t lower then the death rate? I see this issue so much and I really can’t find a good issue other then economic reasons

    • vind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      If the birth rate is too low, the population will progressively become older and older with fewer young people there to support them

        • SybilVane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          2.1 is maintenance level. Each child has 2 parents, and the .1 accounts for infant deaths, etc.

      • Ataraxia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Once all the old people did which will be soon then the issue solves itself. Then maintaining a manageable population will be easy.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Really your only answers are going to be based in economics.

      A society can absolutely thrive with a 1:1 ratio, but not built around a capitalistic mindset. Quite frankly China’s probably the best person to have this problem and they ignore the whims of capitalism for their countries residents quite often.

      Possible non-economic considerations could be not having enough people to build a military and lack of cultural exportation. Both of which China doesn’t really have any problems with.