• AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean,

    I still feel that a dev willing to take a lost sale over a resale, still says more than just saying they’re misinformed.

    And at the end of the day, resell is supposed to be a cheaper way to say “I bought it”. And at the end of the day, devs are saying “If anything, it’s worse for us”

    I don’t think it’s ridiculous. I think resellers are more needing to prove their legitimacy in this case.

    The thing I find most ridiculous honestly, is that you seem to be under the assumption that the devs aren’t already getting noisy chargebacks. Like this whole thing sprouted from nothing.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s ridiculous. I think resellers are more needing to prove their legitimacy in this case.

      Claims made without evidence do not have to be disputed with evidence. The burden of proof is on the party making the claims.

      Everything else you wrote has already been addressed in my previous comment, did you actually read it before responding?