fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoI just cited myself.mander.xyzimagemessage-square231linkfedilinkarrow-up1839
arrow-up1839imageI just cited myself.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square231linkfedilink
minus-squareCrozekiel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoThat’s the best explanation of this I’ve ever seen, thank you!
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-21 year agoThat’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing. 3/3 = 0.99999… 3/3 = 1 If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
minus-squareDagrothus@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoNah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof
That’s the best explanation of this I’ve ever seen, thank you!
That’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing.
3/3 = 0.99999…
3/3 = 1
If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
Nah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof