lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-26 months agoIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square184fedilinkarrow-up1349file-text
arrow-up1349imageIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orglambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-26 months agomessage-square184fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·6 months agoSQL uses it but yeah, not programming language :p. I was on mobile so I didn’t have a .XCompose available to type ≠.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months ago I was on mobile so I didn’t have a .XCompose available to type. I feel the opposite. On mobile I have much easier access to special characters. I just need to hold down characters to get more variants.
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoYup, ≠ is right “under” =. As is ≈.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoSQL is definitely a programming language. Most dialects are Turing-complete in some way. Some allow custom functions and stored procedures.
SQL uses it but yeah, not programming language :p.
I was on mobile so I didn’t have a
.XComposeavailable to type≠.I feel the opposite. On mobile I have much easier access to special characters. I just need to hold down characters to get more variants.
Yup, ≠ is right “under” =. As is ≈.
SQL is definitely a programming language. Most dialects are Turing-complete in some way. Some allow custom functions and stored procedures.