• Lorindól@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wish they had left the 32nd century as a “Discovery - only”. After the jump to the future it felt like the show had no stakes. Everything felt disconnected.

    It feels like an easy excuse for the writers to pull just about anything out of their asses, “because it has been so long” and “tech has evolved exponentially”.

    SNW proved that there was a lot more to explore even in the 23rd century. So much could have been done with the fallout of the Dominion War in the 24th.

    But it’s all up to the writers. If they’re good the show can be good.

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I couldn’t agree less re: the 32nd century. They’ve created an interesting setting, and I’m glad they’re going to keep it alive.

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Agreed, Discovery has really only scratched the surface of what can be done with the Federation’s rebuilding itself, Earth’s new isolationist tendencies, and the unified Vulcan/Romulan society. It’d be a shame to leave all that behind. Plus, we still need to learn what’s become of the Klingons!

      • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The Burn being caused by a magic baby having a tantrum kinda ruined the whole setting for me. There’s a lot of potential with moving to the 32nd century, but if that’s the quality of storytelling we’re gonna get, it doesn’t seem worth it. I’d much rather see a 24th century setting that follows up on the galaxy post Dominion War and the return of Voyager. There’s a lot of untold story there that would be great to see… Although I’d hope it’s not more magic baby style stuff.

        • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think the cause of the Burn is a nearly-perfect example of Star Trek’s humanist values, and find it interesting when people feel the need to go out of their way to misrepresent it with words like “magic” in an effort to justify their dislike of it.

          • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            We can replace the words “magic” with “strongly telepathic” and it’s basically the same problem.

            It’s a great idea to fuck warp travel right on its head as a concept, but the execution was majorly lacking for me. I would have much rather had a continuation of the plot from Force of Nature where warp had significantly damaged subspace gradually (like a climate change allegory), rather than a universe-wide explosion that happened all at once in a flash.