TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1381
arrow-up1381imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?