カニ風 [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoa very emphatic answerlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1470
arrow-up1470imagea very emphatic answerlemmy.blahaj.zoneカニ風 [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareLeviathan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up50·5 months agoThrow up some brackets, you rage-baiting motherfucker!
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·5 months agoNo actually the trick to this one is that Four-Factorial equals 24 So 40 - 16 = 24
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·5 months agoThis one’s perfectly unambiguous without brackets, unlike the 1/2x stuff
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months ago1/2x is also unambiguous. 2a=(2xa) by definition. Has done for at least 180 years. Terms
minus-squareLeviathan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoIt’s perfectly reasonable to read this as both (40-32)/2 and 40-(32/2) anywhere past basic math.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoNo, it isn’t. Division before subtraction.
Throw up some brackets, you rage-baiting motherfucker!
No actually the trick to this one is that Four-Factorial equals 24
So 40 - 16 = 24
Aha! Fair enough.
This one’s perfectly unambiguous without brackets, unlike the 1/2x stuff
1/2x is also unambiguous. 2a=(2xa) by definition. Has done for at least 180 years. Terms
deleted by creator
It’s perfectly reasonable to read this as both (40-32)/2 and 40-(32/2) anywhere past basic math.
No, it isn’t. Division before subtraction.