fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-26 months agoName & shame. :)mander.xyzimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1935
arrow-up1935imageName & shame. :)mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-26 months agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squaremagnetosphere@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up112·edit-26 months agoTo me, this is a major ethical issue. If any actual humans submitted this “paper”, they should be severely disciplined by their ethics board.
minus-squarebitfucker@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up80·6 months agoBut the publisher who published it should be liable too. Wtf is their job then? Parasiting off of public funded research?
minus-squareZozano@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 months agoBitfucker knew that was rhetorical.
minus-squaremynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoHow was that obvious?
minus-squareZozano@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 months agoI can’t tell if this question is rhetorical.
To me, this is a major ethical issue. If any actual humans submitted this “paper”, they should be severely disciplined by their ethics board.
But the publisher who published it should be liable too. Wtf is their job then? Parasiting off of public funded research?
Yes
Bitfucker knew that was rhetorical.
How was that obvious?
I can’t tell if this question is rhetorical.
A spanking!