• dogsoahC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a male scientist, I approve of this constant reaffirmation of my masculinity.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      I dunno. “Man of science” has a really nice ring to it. (“Woman of Science” too.)

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Come to Germany then.

      German uses generic masculine grammatical gender and the state of Bavaria just banned the practice of “Gendern”, meaning use both forms (male and female).

      So you’d have to be referred to as male pretty much always.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        They didn’t ban the usage of both forms, they banned the usage of new forms, that try to combine masculine and feminine into a gender-neutral form, in administrative texts.

          • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes and no, language is how it’s used, not necessarily the rules someone once wrote down. The problem is if you have a generic form and you start using a different form for women the generic form stops being generic. Eventually everyone will settle on some new generic form or resurrect some old form and we can move on to other problems.

          • flora_explora@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            What? How can this be true? “The generic masculine is gender-neutral”? You see where you made a mistake? German and most other languages revolve around a pretty strong gender hierarchy and patriarchy. So no, its default is definitely not gender neutral! I would be in favor of a true neutral. But we would have to come up with a new form.

            • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Yes, it is. It’s a grammatical construct. When someone said “alle Schüler” in the year 2000, they meant all students regardless of their genders. If some meant explicitly male students they’d have said “alle männlichen Schüler” for clarity.

              • flora_explora@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Nope, seeing men as the default and considering everyone else as a secondary option is already a discrimination of the latter. I know that “alle Schüler” is referring to everyone in class, but it is not gender neutral. It assumes male students if not specified otherwise.

                It seems like you don’t acknowledge the existence of patriarchal violence or power. A discussion is probably futile in this case because our value systems are fundamentally different.

                • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Obviously partriarchies exist and they probably originated in the grammatical masculine as the default.

                  But I doubt that patriarchal power or even violence is a systemic issue in Germany today and I think addressing it via centrally trying to change the language is laughable.

                  Let’s take Turkey for example: Turkish is gender neutral, there is no grammatical gender. How did that help equal rights?