onlinepersona@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agoShould it just be called JASM?programming.devimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1171file-text
arrow-up1144imageShould it just be called JASM?programming.devonlinepersona@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareUnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoDo we have 3 assemblies now?
minus-squareYerbaYerba@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoLook no further https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 months agoActual assembly in mainstream use: x86 arm risc v mainstream byte code: jvm .net (I think) wasm fake assembly people may write: llvm wasm wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data. Edit: formatting
Do we have 3 assemblies now?
How many do you want?
One. To rule them all.
Look no further https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer
Actual assembly in mainstream use:
x86
arm
risc v
mainstream byte code:
jvm
.net (I think)
wasm
fake assembly people may write:
llvm
wasm
wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data.
Edit: formatting