• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      And rules of engagement while we’re at it.

      How is it that a soldier sent into literal combat against people he knows are armed and intend to kill them has to be more careful not to shoot someone than a police officer responding to a call about a black person using the sidewalk?

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was deployed, and our rules of engagement was more strict than police officers. We had to keep it on us at all times (exception being for PT and shower time). There were very specific situations about when and where we could use our weapons.

        What is ridiculous is “I was a scared little bitch” was not a reason to use force. Police can get away with killing civilians, unarmed civilians, because “I was scared”. If we did that, our ass would be in Leavenworth. Cops are fucking pathetic.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        A soldier who everyone knows was ordered ‘shoot to kill’, and people think its weird when they’re not.

        They even get multiple months of training!

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Nah. They need the wall. They fought basic accountability too hard, clearly its not gonna happen. Accept that and move on to a more realistic solution.