• gnus_migrate@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you wanted to introduce every industry best practice in an intro course you’d never get to the actual programming.

    It would be good to have a 1 credit course(one hour a week) where you learn industry best practices like version control, testing and stuff like that. But it definitely shouldn’t be at the start.

    • robinm@lemmyrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I teachers were using automated tests instead of printf in their intro courses, it would be so much better. I don’t think that introducing all the various kind of tests is usefull, but just showing the concept of automated tests instead of manual ones would be a huge step forward.

      • gnus_migrate@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is the way they motivate new students to learn programming is by having them write programs that do something. Making a test green isn’t as motivating as visually seeing the output of your work, and test fixtures can be complex to set up depending on the language. I mean students don’t learn how to factor their code into methods until later into such a course, they’re learning if statements and for loops and basic programming constructs. Don’t you think having to explain setting up test fixtures and dependency inversion is a bit too much for people at that level?