I’m currently using Handbrake on a windows 11 installation of a desktop computer. I am planning on turning this desktop computer into a NAS and media server to replace my current raspberry pi 4 system. Handbrake works great on this computer, but I was wondering how I could use Handbrake on this system after I convert it into a media server.
Given that I wouldn’t normally have a GUI to work with for Ubuntu Server, would it make more sense to install Handbrake in a ProxMox VE container, or should I use the docker version of Handbrake? Would there be a performance impact if I were to use the docker container?
The docker container has a web UI, while if I were to use ProxMox, I could have a full fledged OS to work with.
You must log in or register to comment.
You can run tdarr which is automated transcoding.
deleted by creator
… or handbrake-cli
Seconded
I think you’re probably better off using something that’s build for media servers. One really nice feature is adding more processing nodes to make things go faster, like a gaming PC while not playing anything. I don’t think Handbrake can do that by itself.
I just finished setting up transcoding for my media library, and the options I found were Tdarr, FileFlows and Unmanic. They all use ffmpeg and/or Handbrake under the hood, so it kinda comes down to preference. I went with FileFlows because it seemed the most intuitive to me, and it can also process other media like photos, music, audiobooks and ebooks.
I was going to suggest there should be a way to run handbrake locally while pointing its under-the-hood functions to handbrake-cli (also, yes, there’s handbrake-cli) hosted on your server, but I found this instead:
https://medium.com/@joshuaavalon/encode-video-with-handbrake-on-server-17b6127f6ac7
godsspeed, OPIn case your Lenny client concatenates the dot to the link like mine: https://medium.com/@joshuaavalon/encode-video-with-handbrake-on-server-17b6127f6ac7
Container should have negligible overhead, the main problem you’re going to see is where the in/out files are located and shared. Another plus there for docker, can map that volume to anywhere.
If you need a GUI, then handbrake with a web version sounds great, when I did it years ago they didn’t have it.
Since then, I’ve learned ffmpeg and use that regularly and can schedule jobs well now. Definitely more advanced, but more built for server applications.
ffmpeg
What are you using it for
Not really any performance impact from using it in docker.
But you could also use ffmpeg as that’s what handbrake uses under the hood IIRC.
