• perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As soon as the fuzzy “imagine anything you want” of the referendum collapsed into “you must pick one and come up with a plan to mitigate the consequences” of May’s government!

    Any specific result would always have had a minority - the ‘majority’ vote was made up of people wanting opposite things.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. That’s the issue isn’t it. There was one version of remain but dozens of versions of leave but people only got to choose between two options.

      Then when the government realised that there were so many different opinions of what leave meant they spent more than a year with no progress.

        • nogooduser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, after about a year they came out of a meeting at Chequers with a bold plan…… that was almost like being in the EU and got shot down by parliament immediately.

          You could argue that coming up with that plan is progress. It was just in the wrong direction.