• MostlyHarmless@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it stealing if you don’t pay for the cinema? You don’t own anything new after.

      Is it stealing if you don’t pay for your haircut? You don’t own anything new after.

      Is it stealing if you don’t pay for your car service? You don’t own anything new after.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In those three cases, you’re receiving a service (showing you the movie, cutting your hair and servicing your car), so yeah, you’re stealing their work, which is arguably much worse than stealing objects.

        In contrast, copying a copy of a movie or a game or whatever without removing the original or even a copy of it is not stealing.

        And before you chime in with “but future income!”, those profits are hypothetical, so even in the most uncharitable rational definition, you have stolen something that someone MIGHT have gotten.

        Copying is not theft and you can’t steal something that doesn’t and might never exist.

        • fuck reddit@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The gray area where I live is that streaming is not piracy. I didn’t pay for it, but I also didn’t retain a copy.

          Putlocker and Wootly were my go-to spots in college because I wouldn’t get a piracy warning from my internet provider.

          If there are better places these days, please let me know. I miss seeing new movies the same day they hit the digital marketplace

      • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Captain obvious thanks for pointing out that a service and a product are different things. After all why would I pirate porn when fucking a hooker doesn’t get me anything new after?

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not owning it is similar to paying to go to theater or cinema and you don’t own the thing either. I don’t see people complaining that they cannot take video in theaters.

    • dub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is this for movies? Because you can always just buy the DVD lol. Then you would own it

      • axtualdave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even then, your rights are limited. You can’t show it publicly, or make a copy except for personal backup, for instance.

  • Monologue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    internet piracy? i never ever would do such a thing, it is illegal. instead i will pay for 5 streaming services and never own anything. remember, you wouldn’t steal a car.

  • somnuz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing I would (totally naively and magically) wish for is some kind of really well organized and curated time capsule mainly for movies and music preservation.

    I don’t want all the music and movies for myself, I wouldn’t be able to watch/hear it all but I wish for anyone from any time in the future — to have a simple/legal option to just dig anything out, public domain or whatever will work best.

    People have created some amazing gems.

      • somnuz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, yes. This exist — I am really grateful for that, but… This audio library now contains 15M positions. It is a big number, no doubt about it.

        Then, Spotify has over 80M files in the library with around 4M podcasts.

        Estimated existing music amount is unclear but around 90-200M and growing all the time.

        And suddenly 15M is getting somehow small in terms of preserving, and this is with music only.

        With movies I even remember some interviews with Tarantino and Nolan talking about how badly some movies are being mistreated, lost cuts, not even close to proper/safe long time storing, fires, accidents and so on…

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate DRM. Especially as an open sourcer. If all methods of buying it are DRM’ed I won’t buy it. My wife has Netflix and contribute the same to OpenRightsGroup, who fight DRM, to balance out our karma. I won’t watch Netflix.

    But it’s not just media now. A lot of modern device have anti-features and lockout the user. I won’t say owner, because if it’s a computer and your not admin, your not the owner. Car are terrible for this and it rubs right up against Right To Repair. They use this power imbalance to force you to use dealerships. Crazy thing is, the cars modules are also closed black boxes to car manufacturer. I’ve been to car industry talks where automotive engineers complain of this, and everyone is nodding, but they don’t see their own closeness is no better. They want other to be open with them, but don’t want to be open with others.

    It’s a terrible state of play. In future, today will be a digital darkage and will only be the pirated and cracked stuff that makes it through. It’s so stupid, shortsighted, anticompetitive and certain amount of just evil.