• Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Being upfront & clear is a big part of it.

    I think everybody thinks every social platform is very hierarchical and fairly authoritarian - simply bcs there isn’t enough “mods” to form services (like lawyers, law/rule writers and interpreters, etc).

    If there is one mod that bans me for an unwritten rule I don’t go to the equivalent of a supreme court & get them to acknowledge that the rule at the time wasn’t written, that it has to be written now (if approved by the state/owner).
    If that is all one person it’s just fully autocratic.
    And even if that is 10 people it’s still very much the same (best case they can review/talk about my case between themselves). You can’t have a normal community at scales that would even allow for more than this.

    Also, afaik there are no tendencies to move such systems to more democratic (eg mass voting on rules that is triggered if the petition collects 1000 signatures) or more anarchic (calling for peers instead of mods when “a rule” is being broken) ones.