Gollum@feddit.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoNah we can’t do that, right?i.imgur.comimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up157
arrow-up153imageNah we can’t do that, right?i.imgur.comGollum@feddit.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareonion@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·1 year agoIf I remeber right you can do that, because there’s a longer and proper way that arrives at the same conclusion
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoYes, and what is aimed for is separation of variables to find a solution of this differential equation. (The differential operator d should be printed as upright letter btw)
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·1 year agoJust like any kind of mathematics ever. You can also do it with numbers, because there’s a longer and proper way that arrives on the same conclusion.
minus-squaremaeries@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoExept when there isn’t
If I remeber right you can do that, because there’s a longer and proper way that arrives at the same conclusion
Yes, and what is aimed for is separation of variables to find a solution of this differential equation. (The differential operator d should be printed as upright letter btw)
Just like any kind of mathematics ever.
You can also do it with numbers, because there’s a longer and proper way that arrives on the same conclusion.
Exept when there isn’t