Yezzey@lemmy.ca to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 26 days agoDoes anyone remember Third Voice? You could graffiti any website and only people who had plugin installed could see it. Why isn't there a modern alternative?en.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square61linkfedilinkarrow-up1211
arrow-up1211external-linkDoes anyone remember Third Voice? You could graffiti any website and only people who had plugin installed could see it. Why isn't there a modern alternative?en.wikipedia.orgYezzey@lemmy.ca to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 26 days agomessage-square61linkfedilink
minus-squareraman_klogius@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-226 days agoThen Zuck who’s incapable of fun emotions found out rage drives more engagement. 😔
minus-squareYezzey@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·26 days agoToo bad “funny” isn’t as profitable as “furious”.
minus-squaresome_kind_of_guy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·26 days agoThing is, funny could be profitable “enough”, but not for them
minus-squareMagicShel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-224 days agoIt’s the opposite of Monsters, Inc.
When the internet was fun
Then Zuck who’s incapable of
funemotions found out rage drives more engagement. 😔Too bad “funny” isn’t as profitable as “furious”.
Thing is, funny could be profitable “enough”, but not for them
It’s the opposite of Monsters, Inc.