danhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoemacsprogramming.devimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1584
arrow-up1510imageemacsprogramming.devdanhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-squareTOR-anon1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down7·1 year agoI use nano. Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-21 year ago4 letters < 2 letters. vi forever.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s when you switch to a IDE.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYes, if you can remember the shortcuts… M-x IDE
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
minus-squareElDieLaDer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoOk but why use nano when micro literally exists
I use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
4 letters < 2 letters.
vi forever.
Simplicity > Complexity
Not if you need any work done.
That’s when you switch to a IDE.
Neovim and emacs are IDEs.
Yes, if you can remember the shortcuts…
M-x IDENano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists