• Shimitar@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I strongly agree with the author. But at the same time nobody can and should block Meta from joining.

      Will that kill all this?

      • emptyother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The teaching I get from this is: Dont let Meta dictate the protocol. As soon as they become incompatible, let them stay incompatible until they follow. And be happy with the users who were smart enough to stay with the reliable platform.

        • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          This won’t work if Meta gains enough users to swing their weight around. Microsoft does the same thing with Embrace, Extend, Extinguish and it’s not something to just ignore.

      • fiasco@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Individual instance owners can block Meta instances from federating (exchanging data), and they absolutely, 100% should do so. If enough instances block Meta, it’ll be like they don’t even exist.

        The bigger issue is that corporations can present a united front, while federations cannot. This is why hegemonic forces tend to win; as the author says, there’s already division among kbin/Lemmy users about whether blocking Meta is a good idea. You can be damn sure there isn’t similar division among Facebook leadership about whether to destroy kbin/Lemmy.