They are two different conditions that appear similar. But they are not the same.

  • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because they are the same underlying condition, only presented at different levels of impediment.

    Diagnosis works the same, treatment is the same, it’s mostly the amount of support needed that differs.

  • nyoooom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the same reason that we don’t use the concept of race between humans, because it’s a spectrum with no distinct delimitation point.

    You will find people of all shades of colors, all types of hairs, etc. just like you will find autistic people with different sensitivities, different creativity, different interests, different needs, and you can fill the whole spectrum, you won’t get a gap between “autistic” and “asperger”.

  • juliebean@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    they were basically the same. the only real distinction in the actual diagnostic criteria was about speech delay. if you took longer than usual to speak as a kid, it had to be autism, but if you spoke at a usual age, then flip a coin i guess. it was found that which diagnosis you might get would depend mostly on the doctor’s personal preferences, or outside social factors, like which diagnosis wouls get better access to support under local laws, rather than any objective metric.

  • anti_fun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The book Neurotribes by Steve Silberman can be read as a very detailed answer to this question