This is really big imo.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    You shouldn’t expect full interoperability with this alone! At most, you should expect that your public posts get shared with your followers on Mastodon (i.e. an outbox)

    fart noises

  • Olap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is big. Bluesky is getting lots of traction with normies who want off Twitter. Mastodon and pleroma and pixelfed all about to become much more discoverable

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      We pretty much had this when the first reliable Mastodon<->Bluesky bridge came online. The Fediverse side protested and made the entire system opt-in, making it practically unusable because people that don’t have a favourite Linux distro don’t know what a fedi is and why they should bridge to it.

      When this goes live, I expect people to treat it the same as every other sizeable social media joining the Fediverse, with outrange and block lists.

      • Tony Bark@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I dunno. I still posts from the Bluesky bridge getting boosts. This might not be as bad Threads.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Exactly. It is a huge, authoritarian, corporate platform that can absolutely ruin the fedi if it ever turns against us (think ads, bad moderation, nudging campaigns, etc).

        Its not at all as black and white as threads is but it is still a huge problem.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s the benefit of Bluesky being totally centralized, not built with any capability for federation: When they decide to add some, they can hardly fail to see that it’s best to go with ActivityPub.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Hmm, let’s see if I remember the terminology correctly:

        Client apps have nothing to do with it, obviously.

        Alternate appviews have nothing to do with it, except in that they’d presumably need to work with whatever form of atproto federation exists, if any did.

        Alternate relays aren’t federated unless there’s some protocol for routing messages between them — such as ActivityPub.

        • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          So, bluesky works differently to fedi.

          A PDS stores your posts/comments/likes/blocks/articles/whatever. These all get crawled and saved to a relay.
          An appview connects to a relay and sorts through all the posts, and indexes them.
          They handle all the interactions, rather than passing messages between servers.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Let me just ask the less technical and more important questions:

            1. If BSky goes out of business and shuts down their servers, will these continue to function?
            2. Does BSky still have any control at all over moderation?