Larion Studios forum stores your passwords in unhashed plaintext. - Lemmy.world
lemmy.world
Larion Studios forum stores your passwords in unhashed plaintext. Don’t use a password there that you’ve used anywhere else.

This thread is frustrating. Everyone seems more interested in nitpicking the specifics of what OP is saying and are ignoring that a forum sends you your password (not an automatically generated one) in an email on registration.

    • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
      51·
      1 year ago

      Reversible hashed password storage isn’t meaningfully better than clear text.

      • The key to reverse the hash is typically (necessarily) stored in the same infrastructure as the password. Bad actors with access to one have access to the combination.
      • Even if an attacker fails to exfiltrate the key to the reversible hash, it’s typically only a matter of days at the most before they can reverse engineer it, and produce plain text copies of every password they obtained the hash of.

      A reversible hash provides a paper thin layer of protection against accidental disclosure. A one way hash is widely considered the bare minimum for password storage.

      Anyone claiming a password has been protected, and then being able to produce the original password, is justly subject to ridicule in security communities.

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        The one they were sending at registration was prior to hashing. It would not be reversible afterwards.

        • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
          2·
          1 year ago

          That’s technically less terrible, then.

          Good for them. /s

          Edited to add the /s for clarity, because the NIST recommended remediation in 2023 for emailing a password is “burn everything down and pretend the organization never existed”. /s

          Again, adding that /s since that’s not actually what NIST says to do, and I am, at best, paraphrasing.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      45·
      1 year ago

      I wasn’t trying to claim what was happening here, simply that one (extremely) bad practice increases the chance of another.