Context:

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Since when do we not talk about politics on Lemmy? That and posting about Linux is about the crux of Lemmy. Mods cannot decide censorship is warranted because they deem a subject “controversial”.

    But before you decide to respond I would recommend you watch at least the first 10 minutes of this video as adresses every argument you made.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Oh, talking about politics on lemmy is fine.

      Pounding the political pulpit beyond the bare minimum necessary on this community is where it goes wrong.

      And yes, actually, moderators absolutely get to decide what is and isn’t appropriate content for their community. That’s what a moderator is, the person or persons that curate a community.

      And, yet a-fucking-gain, as I’ve already said, I’m not getting into debate about the subject itself here. I’m also not wasting my time with some random YouTube video as a proxy to that

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Pounding the political pulpit beyond the bare minimum necessary on this community is where it goes wrong.

        You said that comments denying the right of Israel to exist should be removed. This cannot be followed up by refusing to elaborate. If there is anything wrong or racist about saying an Apartheid should not exist then you are welcome to back it up with claims.

        I am of the opposite opinion that anyone who believes Israel has the right to exist is racist.

        And yes, actually, moderators absolutely get to decide what is and isn’t appropriate content for their community. That’s what a moderator is, the person or persons that curate a community.

        With all the complains about “.ml censorship” I would not expect this kind of arguments here. LW moderators having the power to censor for Israel does not mean they are not in the wrong for doing it.

          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            I was hoping you would have something more than “criticism of Israel is antisemitic” but I am not surprised and understand why you wanted to avoid the argument.

            Have a good day.

              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                Look, just because you haven’t bothered to learn what Israeli propaganda is in this context doesn’t mean it isn’t the case

                • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Really? You’re running around repeating known dog whistles, and now you want to argue that pointing out dog whistles are propaganda?

                  Nah, at this point, you’ve down exactly who you are

                  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Calling criticism of Israel a dogwhistle is known Zionist propaganda.

                    You are making it painfully obvious what your beliefs are but it is clear you dare not speak your mind.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        And, yet a-fucking-gain, as I’ve already said, I’m not getting into debate about the subject itself here.

        So why are you still typing?