• Uruanna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    … And you still don’t understand it, and you assume that everyone else is wrong even after it was explained to you. That quote is correct and it does not contradict what the PhD said. In fact, it illustrates exactly what they said.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      That there are men (xy) with female parts, do I was correct when I said that parts don’t define gender

      I don’t think the phd is saying that though because they talk about xx becoming xy

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        That there are men (xy) with female parts

        This is your misunderstanding right there. XY is not automatically a man. You are the one making the claim that chromosoms define if you are a man or a woman, and the PhD and the other guy are telling you that there are people born with XY who are cis women with female genitalia. You are wrong.

        they talk about xx becoming xy

        No, they are saying no such thing. They are telling you that there are people born with XY but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women. No one told you that some XY people changed to XX, or XX to XY. This does not happen. This is not what the PhD said, and this is not what the other guy explained to you. You are wrong. And you keep claiming that everybody else is wrong, without ever questioning your own understanding.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Now you’re saying it

          No matter what conservatives like you or that doctor say

          They are telling you that there are people born with XY but who have female genitalia and grow up to be cis women

          what’s in your pants doesn’t determine gender

          • Uruanna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            ??? No one said it determines your gender. We’re telling you that it happens. Obviously there are XY people who grow up to be cis men, trans women, but also cis women, and surely trans men as well, or anything inbetween, with any form of gender expression you can think of. You’re the only one making this all up for some reason.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Has y = man

              No y = woman

              no matter someone’s parts or how they act changes that. Stop being sexist

              • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Has y = man

                No y = woman

                No. You are conflating chromosoms, gender, sex. The PhD is telling you that you are wrong. You are claiming that you know better than them. The whole meme is about you, you have Dunning-Kruger, they have a PhD.

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  okay without being sexiest, what is the difference between a man and a woman that isn’t sex?

                  (Hint: there is none, but feel free to parrot whatever fox news tells you)

                  • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    No one has said anything about any of that, you are making up this argument out of nothing, no one has tried to define what a man or a woman is - except you, actually. You are moving the discussion and muddying what is even being argued about, so you can pretend I’m a conservative for some reason and the doctor is as bad as an anti-vaxxer. Even though you’re the one who tried to declare what a man or a woman is, when that wasn’t the subject at all. You are projecting.