Iā€™m gonna get real with you folks, weā€™ve had way too many of these posts recently. Iā€™ve been reflecting on this topic a lot the past few days. For me personally, I couldnā€™t care less about my gender identity. But just because thatā€™s true for me, doesnā€™t make that true for everyone.

The beauty of the fediverse is that if you donā€™t like the way a particular instance or community is moderated you can simply choose another to hang out on, or create your own.

Blajah has made it pretty clear by now they will ban anyone who argues against the validity of xenogenders, in order to create a safe space for those folks. Thatā€™s fair enough imo.

Safe spaces should be respected, and Blajahā€™s admins/mods do not deserve abuse for creating and maintaining those spaces.

I can completely understand why Blajah users donā€™t want to have to constantly argue with external users about the validity of their chosen identities. Bans are one way Blajah has decided to manage that problem so that their users can experience lemmy in relative peace and safety. While it is a blunt tool and I have my reservations about preemptive bans, there are not many other options for @[email protected], other than defederation from most instances. That would be a terrible outcome for the fediverse as a whole.

In order to help Blajah to maintain their safe space, I would like to propose, if @[email protected] agrees and community sentiment is positive:

  • that we no longer accept posts about this topic in this community; and - we also remove previous posts on this topic from the community.

Thatā€™s all folks, have at 'er.

Edit: thanks for all your feedback and comments. I think itā€™s clear that the vast majority of people are fed up with this topic coming up repeatedly.

Summarizing the feedback, Iā€™d say most folks would prefer to retain previous posts for the sake of posterity, and to serve as an example of why we donā€™t want anymore of these posts. Iā€™m happy to take that on board. For those folks saying Iā€™m a PTB for intervening in this way, Iā€™ll just remind you that I havenā€™t made any arbitrary mod decisions, and Iā€™ve consulted with db0 and the community as a whole before taking any mod actions.

I think the way to move forward with this is to acknowledge that thereā€™s a bunch of queer and straight people who have a problem with xenogenders. Personally, I think thatā€™s a valid perspective and shouldnā€™t sanctioned on our instance. But for Blajah, theyā€™ve drawn a line in the sand over this and thatā€™s ok too. Our instance wonā€™t be blocking anyone over their opinions on the topic, especially in this community where free discussion is necessary and encouraged. But safe spaces should be respected.

A lot of folks mentioned I should more more specific about the ā€œno more posts about Blajahā€™s mod policiesā€ rather than making it a sweeping and overly broad statement. I think thatā€™s good feedback. I will amend this to "No more posts in this community about the validity or otherwise of neopronouns, xenogenders, and bans originating from Blajah about gatekeeping or transphobia. This is in recognition of Blajahā€™s safe space policy. You are of course free to discuss those topics outside of this community.

Note that this decision isnā€™t about ideological gatekeeping, its about reducing the workload for our own mods and admins in trying to moderate this community, and to avoid iterating over the same old topics again and again.

Blajah isnā€™t getting a ā€œfree passā€ over YPTB posts - if you feel they are power tripping over other issues then feel free to make a post here. But if itā€™s a post questioning the validity of xenogenders or about Blajah bans for gatekeeping then that will no longer be allowed here. Those folks deserve a safe space on Lemmy, even if itā€™s not a mainstream opinion.

For those folks who feel aggrieved about being accused of ā€œtransphobiaā€ or ā€œgatekeepingā€ over their views on this topic, I completely understand just how hurtful it can be to be unfairly (imo) accused in this way. Iā€™ve been in the same position, and I also found it difficult to deal with. I want those folks to know that our instance does not require you to support xenogenders in order to participate in our instance. However we do require that you use preferred pronouns whenever they are specified. Thatā€™s been a longstanding instance policy on dbzer0.

Thank everyone for your feedback.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    12 hours ago

    Regardless of oneā€™s view on xenopronouns in specific, or neopronouns one general, the claim hasnā€™t been that dragon is a gender.

    PugJesus already covered it. Just to clarify, though, because your point is perfectly fair:

    I get the policy about using pronouns when youā€™re talking to people. It makes some amount of sense to me, I already talked elsewhere in these comments about why I can completely understand just needing to set a clear, consistent policy on using peopleā€™s pronouns regardless of anything else. Makes sense. I kind of think that when someoneā€™s clearly exploiting that policy to mock queer people to their faces, there maybe needs to be a commonsense exception instead of going to bat for the anti-queer troll, but itā€™s whatever. As people have pointed out, that problem has already been solved and dealt with.

    When I say ā€œdragon is a gender,ā€ I am talking about people who are screaming that anyone who doesnā€™t agree with the policy is ā€œmisgenderingā€ or ā€œtransphobicā€ or a fascist or secretly yearns to start calling all these LGBTQ people slurs. Itā€™s super weird, and dishonest. Itā€™s divisive and stupid. And using the word ā€œmisgenderingā€ in reference to it, which a ton of people are doing, is predicated on the assumption (never started explicitly) that dragon is a gender. And people are getting banned (PugJesus is one, LittleRatInALittleHat is one) not for ever refusing to use the pronouns to anybody in particular, but just by talking about the policy or saying their opinion on it or pointing out that dragon is not, in fact, a gender.

    Your list of multiple options doesnā€™t really apply, since neither PugJesus nor LittleRatInALittleHat were interacting directly with anybody at all, just talking about the issue in general terms. Theyā€™ve got a right to do that, I think. Again, I get the reason for the original policy. Whatā€™s ridiculous is using that as a jumping-off point to say ā€œIf you have any disagreement with this policy, even if youā€™re not expressing it to me but just talking with other people about it in general, you are bad and transphobic and you need to be banned and youā€™re a fascist and you hate queer people and youā€™re not allowed to disagree with me because I have X identity and if you do, you are anti-X.ā€