fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1735
arrow-up1735imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-25 hours agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.