mod
Removed Comment Did nothing wrong by sunzu2 reason: Rule against wrongful advocacy
mod
Banned sunzu2 from the community Ask Lemmy reason: Will not tolerate blind alignment with Luigi Mangione expires: in 3 days

Alright good folk, what’s your take here.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Seems like another mod took things a step further than I did. I don’t blame them, although I simply locked the discussion.

      • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        you literally permabanned me because I said luigi then mentioned you have a bad source, lol. Can you power trip less?

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          …as opposed to you outright making it explicit your aim was violence?

          It would be one thing if people complained about moderation but were fully transparent about all the things that went on from their end.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That was a bait though and he never explicitly called for violence.

            Why are mods so inclined to waste their time doing this?

            Hmmm

            • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Even though he says so in the screenshot that’s right there?

              And why do you call it bait like that’s a plus?

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.orgOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                What does he actually say?

                Mod said violence and he made a cheeky retort. Them he got sanctioned. That’s what a bait looks like. Mod behavior was in bad faith here.

                I will let others make their judgement call but this is a common tactic used by mods on world to censor unsanctioned opinions.

                The speech in question didn’t rise to threat of violence, just memeing Luigi. Y’all trying to make it into something it really wasn’t to justify censorship.

                Their house and their rules but people should be aware what they are dealing with. Seed lemmy.world is bad for free speech and hard hitting discussions that we as society face. Only neo liberal agenda is permitted. Classic wolf in sheep coat issue.

                • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  When a conflict is being resolved, the message, the intent, and the context are taken into consideration. So suppose you have someone “bait” and cause it to slowly escalate into something that breaks both TOS and several places’ laws/rules and you do something about it, only for the same exact “bait” to show up elsewhere verbatim, initially with good faith taken into consideration but then with the “baiter” revealing he fully intends the thing the people enforcing the rules fear in the first place (which, yes, if you look at what happened, entailed the violence you are denying), ruling out any hope for intent, all while everyone is piling up on a thread that has little to do with the topic they are being passionate about in the first place. What, then, do you expect would happen?

                  “Free speech” is seldom considered to encompass conspiracy or encouragement/incitement to engage in lawbreaking behavior, both of which are against said laws in even the most free places. At that point, someone might as well argue spying on people is free speech, based on the same “everything goes” mindset that goes into the topic, but then (emphasis on “then”) you run into the people who cite their freedoms while invalidating the law saying they have boundaries on what they consider to qualify.

                  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.orgOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    conspiracy or encouragement/incitement to engage in lawbreaking behavior

                    What is the " law breaking" behaviour here again? Which law is broken?

                    Y’all need to get a lawyer because these appeals to authority while talking out of your is clowny.