…title is a lie, actually it’s a ploy to explain parallel reduction of a massive set of particles to get an AABB. He fesses up to it in the end.
…title is a lie, actually it’s a ploy to explain parallel reduction of a massive set of particles to get an AABB. He fesses up to it in the end.
Well it is a problem with the procedural generation he did, and, in general, also in general: How to constrain the output to be something that’s not white noise, has no dysfunctional/unplayable worst cases, etc.
It may be clickbait yes but it’s mathematically substantiated clickbait.
I don’t care what the content of the videos is. I don’t watch clickbait. A thumbnail & title like that on YT lands your channel immediately on my blocklist. Content creators like this can fuck right off because they’re what made YT such a horrid platform nowadays.
If you don’t care about the content of the video then you cannot care about the relationship between video content and title, much less it being mismatched, therefore, you cannot care about clickbait. You cannot even identify clickbait, yet you claim to not watch it. In short, you make absolutely no sense.
I see clickbait also fried your reading comprehension.
You don’t seem to understand what clickbait even is so I doubt the problem lies with me.
Can you explain what is offending you, here? The title is referring to problems with procedural generation, the thumbnail is showing a problem with procedural generation, the video is about problems with procedural generation, and goes into depth about one particular solution to one particular problem, which happens to involve generating an AABB on the GPU, as an example of the kind of work that can be necessary when you’re doing procedural generation.
Where have you been mislead? How did you even come to the conclusion what it is clickbait? You haven’t made any actual critique of the video, of the thumbnail, or even of the title.
All you did is assert “fuck clickbait shit”, without explanation, rhyme, or reason, and now are lashing out even more. Make it make sense.
You called the title a lie and he took that to mean it was clickbait, then closed his ears
A title lying & making some outlandish obtuse claim = clickbait
A thumbnail using a red arrow = clickbait Another caption in the thumbnail further amplifying the bullshit title = clickbait Using a thumbnail of a chunk border that happens because of larger changes within the worldgen code from switching different versions in an existing world, not because of the problems with procedural generation = clickbait
Maybe actually learn what clickbait is, especially after initially agreeing that is clickbait and now backpedaling while saying that it actually isn’t clickbait. You’re inconsistently stupid here, which is at least consistent with you in the past spreading fascist propaganda in German communities. If you can’t even identify clickbait then I guess I can see what platform radicalized you.
You’ve never had any issues, problems, with procedural generation? How much of that kind of code have you written?
Erm what.
Yes that’s a problem with procedural generation. Games need patching once in a while, using procgen makes game state migration quite a bit more involved.
I suppose you have receipts to back that up. I’d be very interested indeed in seeing them. Presumably your perception is based on you having as much of an understanding of fascism as you have of clickbait.
No, seriously: Back that slander up or retract it. Not just of me btw but of those communities themselves for not banning the shit out of fascist BS.
What in the actual disingenuous fuck, mate? lmao
Yeah, your comments here. https://fedia.io/m/[email protected]/t/887750/Where-did-AfD-voters-come-from-and-where-did-they
Nah. They’re blocked exactly for their mod abuse and selective rulings, especially regarding disinformation and trolls like you. They can continue to burn for all I care at this point.
Well I have written procgen code. Not my speciality but I’ve seen enough to know that Acerola is spot-on with the issues he’s highlighting.
So, if I were to, say, say that Ted Kaczynski had an environmentalist streak, would that make me an apologist for terrorism? Saying that someone who does terrible things also happens to care about the environment is condoning those terrible things? Even if juxtaposed by, I quote myself from that thread: “[Beate Zschäpe is] a murderous fascist assclown”? That’s fascist propaganda in your book?