• MrTallyman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My take is that no matter which language you are using, and no matter the field you work in, you will always have something to learn.

    After 4 years of professional development, I rated my knowledge of C++ at 7/10. After 8 years, I rated it 4/10. After 15 years, I can confidently say 6.5/10.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Understanding how complex something is, is irriversible. Once you reach that plateau you will always know how much there is you don’t know.

    • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Amen. I once had an interview where they asked what my skill is with .net on a scale of 1 - 10. I answered 6.5 even though at the time I had been doing it for 7 years. They looked annoyed and said they were looking for someone who was a 10. I countered with nobody is a 10, not them or even the people working on the framework itself. I didn’t pass the interview and I think this question was why.

      • CodeBlooded@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        As a hiring manager, I can understand why you didn’t get the job. I agree that it’s not a “good” question, sure, but when you’re hiring for a job where the demand is high because a lot is on the line, the last thing you’re going to do is hire someone who says their skills are “6.5/10” after almost a decade of experience. They wanted to hear how confident you were in your ability to solve problems with .NET. They didn’t want to hear “aCtUaLlY, nO oNe Is PeRfEcT.” They likely hired the person who said “gee, I feel like my skills are 10/10 after all these years of experience of problem solving. So far there hasn’t been a problem I couldn’t solve with .NET!” That gives the hiring manager way more confidence than something along the lines of “6.5/10 after almost a decade, but hire me because no one is perfect.” (I am over simplifying what you said, because this is potentially how they remembered you.)

        Unfortunately, interviews for developer jobs can be a bit of a crap shoot.

        • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          They wanted to hear how confident you were in your ability to solve problems with .NET. They didn’t want to hear “aCtUaLlY, nO oNe Is PeRfEcT.”

          Yeah, I mean no shit, with hindsight it’s obvious they were looking for the 10/10 answer. I was kicking myself for days afterwards because that’s the only question I felt I answered “wrong”. Tech interviews are such a shit show though that you can start to overthink things as an interviewee. Also, an important aspect of the question that I didn’t mention was they specified “1 is completely new, and 10 is working at Microsoft on the .net framework itself”. The question caught me off guard. I have literally no idea what working at Microsoft on the framework is like. In that context being a 10/10 felt like being among the most knowledgeable person of c# of all time. Could I work on the framework itself? Idk maybe, I’ve never thought about it, I don’t even know what their day to day is. I should’ve just said 10/10 though, it was a dev II position to work on a web app, it wouldn’t have been that hard.

          • CodeBlooded@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            10 is working at Microsoft on the .net framework itself.

            An interesting spin. I like to imagine that you could have answered “10/10,” taken a pause, and declared that you’re leaving the interview early to apply directly to Microsoft to “work on the .net framework itself.” 🤓

            dev II position to work on a web app

            ”we want you to tell us that you’re over qualified for the role”