• cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There is no such big differences between a light emitting (LED) and a light receiving diode (photodiode), they are just the reverse of each other. In fact photodiodes can even emit light, but very inefficiently. Same in reverse, LEDs can also detect light, just badly.

    It seems like most efficient energy conversion methods can be used in both directions.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, but you would blow out most of the amplification circuitry in a radio telescope reciver if you tried to use it for broadcast at any kind of power.

    • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      An LED (or photodiode used as one) is a fairly simplistic device compared to an assembled receiver / transmitter. Just like you can burn gasoline in a car but you can’t push a car to turn the engine to make gasoline - it’s a complex system that really only works one way.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nothing gets burned or otherwise destroyed when receiving EM radiation via a dish and converted it into electricity via a receiver.

        Sure, the amplification stage of the process likely works only one way, and should be replaced in order to send something.

        The one way process of burning oil to generate heat seems much more primitive than the energy conversion offered by a diode, TBH.

        You can push or tow an electric car and charge their batteries. Because electric motors are also generators.

        Even with your simplistic fossil fuel car in your example the alternator within can also be used as a motor.

        • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even with your simplistic fossil fuel car in your example the alternator within can also be used as a motor.

          Not by “simply reversing the flow” it can’t. You’d need to remove and replace many components, just like the example of changing an Rx to Tx system