• Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Recently I’ve actually been wondering how the hell researchers manage their citations for big projects, because a while back I started doing some research on the Cass Review, tripped on my own dick and accidentally ended up with 70-something disorganized citations (that I actually used) that were a pain in the ass to clean up.

    I’m definitely checking out those first three software lol

    • bobtimus_prime@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I made good experiences with Zotero. Works well with LaTeX, a browser-plugin allows to add papers directly and you can annotate downloaded PDFs. Only problem I had were the paper-metadata, which often needed some fixing. Also that you cannot host your own server is a slight disadvantage.

      • Phineaz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        +1 for Zotero and Biblatex. You do need the “Better Bibtex”-Plugin though, or at least I highly recommend it.

        “Zotfile” allows you to more or less automatically create a filesystem, so as long as you have a way to sync parts of your drive (or access a server) you can have working links to every paper in your library on any machine.

        • dunyol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Zotero 7 (the latest main version) broke compatibility with Zotfile, but there are plugins around that are either forks of the version that ran on Zotero 6 or reimplementations of Zotfile’s features.

          I personally have been using Zotero Attanger and it’s been working great for me.