Many journalists seem to think twitter is the whole internet. When trump left, so did coverage of his posts. I don’t know if it’s overall a bad thing. This article argues you should look at what he says so as to not let it fade in the background, but trump is a very much “all attention is good attention” type of guy

I’d sooner be rolled down a hill while locked inside a Port-a-Potty than spend a minute of my time in the nightmare swamps of Trump’s incomprehensible rants.

But here ya go…https://trumpstruth.org/

The site in question they’re talking about: https://trumpstruth.org/

The only good thing about that social network is keeping toxic things in their place.

It’s not (just) that Trump seems unpresidential

Unfortunately, in the long and storied history of US presidents, being a bigotted misogynist freak is extremely normal

he seems like an unwell elderly man posting AI slop for an audience of bots on Facebook

Somewhere between Woodrow Wilson and Ronald Reagan on the Normal President Spectrum.

I wonder if someone here is willing to create some account on there and start archiving what he says.

The best part of the debate was when Kamala Harris recommended people go a Trump rally to see how unhinged he got. There should be value to seeing his crazy microblogs in case you think about voting for him.

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support