

While it performs well nd has fancy new features, it’s still lacking one that I use every day: find words on the already-printed text: https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues/189
It looks like it’s going to take months until it’s available


While it performs well nd has fancy new features, it’s still lacking one that I use every day: find words on the already-printed text: https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues/189
It looks like it’s going to take months until it’s available


I know, yes. But I’m talking about virtualization, not containerizarion


Personally, I want to properly isolate the services with virtualization. The main reason is I expose some of the services online, and I don’t t want to only rely on keeping all software up-to-date at all times. This allows me to limit the damage if one of the services is compromised.
I wouldn’t use MacOS as the virtualization platform, and instead use something else, like BSD, Linux, or xen-based for my servers


It didn’t get review-bombed. It got negative reviews after the last update because people don’t like it.
Personally I bought it and don’t like it: it’s an awkward mix between diablo-likes and souls-like, while not reaching the heights of either, it also has its own unresolved issues, like lack of descriptions for weapons or abilities. This might have been fine on the first release of the early access, but we’re almost a year in and people expect initial 8ssues to be fixed.


Xcp-ng might have the edge against bare metal because Windows uses virtualization by default uses Virtualization-Based Security (VBS). Under xcp-ng it can’t use that since nested virtualization can’t be enabled.
Disclaimer: I’m a maintainer of the control plane used by xcp-ng
There’s time until March for the maintainers of the 3 niche architectures to organize and make rust available for them. Doesn’t sound that abrupt to me